| Excerpts from latest analyst reports…. The network effect. Given the established reputation of Singapore companies in respecting intellectual rights, TSH is a natural choice for foreign customers to work with. Being an ODM player. TSH is able to work with customers to tailor products to their requirements and since the Group is known to respect patents/copy rights and royalties, its customers have little to worry on infringement of such matters in dealing with TSH. Going forward, the Group will develop mobile internet devices to capture the rising popularity of the mobile networked generation. E-book readers will be a key driver this year, but there are already plans to launch mobile PCs and other products. Initiate with BUY and target price of S$0.255. We initiate coverage with a BUY recommendation and target price of S$0.255 based on parity to CY11 BVPS. Interestingly, ex cash P/E for CY11 is a mere 2.2x or an earnings yield of 45.5%.
Source: CIMB, Oct 6
Risks Dependent on major customers. The Homeland security services segment of TSH’s business is highly dependant on a few government related Companies. According to management, contracts are awarded on a contract basis, should TSH fail to secure contracts from either of their major customers, revenue and profitability will be impacted significantly. Margin squeeze. Consumer electronics products are characterized by fast moving technology and relatively low barriers to entry. As barriers of entry are low, the firm has to compete on quality and price, while differentiating itself for competitors offering similar products. Moreover, costs of manufacturing are dependant on cost of raw materials and labour. The Group’s manufacturing operations are centred in the coastal regions of China, in Shenzhen and Hangzhou, which have been affected by rising cost of labour. Inability for the firm to differentiate itself from competitors and command better prices for goods, while managing input costs will lead to margin squeeze.
CIMB rates NOL and Berlian Laju as ‘outperform’
Berlian Laju trades at 4 cents but CIMB has a 9-cent target price.
• We are OVERWEIGHT on containers but NEUTRAL on dry bulk and UNDERWEIGHT on tanker shipping. Our Outperform recommendations include NOL (NOL SP; Outperform; TP S$2.25) and Berlian Laju Tanker (BLTA SP; Outperform; TP $0.09). • For the container shipping sector, we expect Neptune Oriental Lines (NOL) to benefit from high locked-in transpacific contract rates until next year May/June, despite the currently falling spot rates to the US. This will underpin its strong financial performance in 2H09 and at least into 1H10. • For the tanker shipping sector, our top pick remains as BLTA. We like the chemical tanker for attractive valuations (0.4x P/B despite having a relatively strong expected ROE of 9.2%). BLTA has also achieved a small core net profit of US$1.1m in 2Q10, and we expect results to improve from stronger investment income in 2H10.
|
Most Popular >>
- GLOBAL PREMIUM HOTELS IPO: Insights into room pricing
- JEL (15-bagger stock): Look out for significant M&A event(s)
- ERATAT AGM: Good turnout, pertinent (but familiar) questions asked
- YANGZIJIANG: Celebrates 5 stellar years of growth on Singapore bourse
- CHINA FIBRETECH: "Ridiculous that the market is pricing it at less than 4 cents"
- BUFFETT Says China May Already Have Its Coke
- ROXY-PACIFIC chalks up another $150 m sales, ASL Marine target is 83 cents
- MIDAS: Will its train recover speed fast next year?
Your Say >>
- Re:Why i increase my cash holdings
- Re:Healthway Medical
- Re: HIAP HOE
- Re:China Animal
- Re:China Animal -- the time has come?
- MIDAS HOLDINGS -- dbs says buy!
- Re:why china minzhong
- Crying Game in biggest S-Chip market
- China Minzhong
- Re:Re:Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:HIAP HOE
- Re:Qingmei
- Re:Juken
- Re:Re:Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?
- Re:Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:Juken warrants -- be careful of commisison cost
- Re:Juken
- Juken: 14% gain for holding for 4 months
- Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:Re:Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?
- Re:Re:Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?
- Re:Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?
- Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?







